The 4% rule and its limits
The famous rule from the Trinity Study, where it comes from, and why it might be wrong in either direction.
The 4% rule says: withdraw 4% of your portfolio in year 1 of retirement, then adjust that dollar amount for inflation each year. Based on US historical data, this withdrawal rate survived every 30-year retirement window from 1926 onward, even including the Great Depression.
The origin
The rule comes from the Trinity Study (Cooley, Hubbard, Walz, 1998), which ran thousands of historical back-tests on different withdrawal rates and asset allocations. For a 50/50 stock/bond portfolio over 30 years, 4% had roughly a 95% success rate. It was a rule of thumb, not a guarantee.
Why it might be too high
- US market returns over the 20th century were historically exceptional — other developed markets produced lower results.
- If you retire at the start of a bad decade for stocks, sequence-of-returns risk can blow up the math (more on that elsewhere).
- Many people want retirement to last 40+ years, not 30. Longer horizons need lower withdrawal rates (3.3–3.5% is a common 'perpetual' number).
Why it might be too low
- The rule assumes you never adjust spending. In reality, people can cut back in bad years and add in good years.
- Social Security replaces part of your income, so your portfolio doesn't need to cover everything.
- Most 30-year simulations end with way more money than they started with — 4% was the floor, not the median.
Put this into practice
Worth tracks your accounts, budgets, and goals — so the concepts in this article aren't just theory.
Get started free