InvestingBeginner5 min read

Total stock market vs. the S&P 500: does it matter?

They overlap almost completely, yet the choice sparks endless debate. What the total market adds, why the difference is tiny, and how to pick.

Two of the most popular index funds on earth are the S&P 500 fund and the total US stock market fund. New investors often agonize over which to buy, imagining a big decision. The honest answer: they are roughly 85% identical, both are excellent, and the difference between them will almost certainly be a rounding error over your lifetime. But the small differences are worth understanding.

What each one holds

An S&P 500 fund holds about 500 of the largest US companies. A total stock market fund (such as VTI or FSKAX) holds essentially every investable US company - roughly 3,500 to 4,000 of them, adding the mid-cap, small-cap, and micro-cap companies the S&P 500 leaves out. Because both are market-cap weighted, the giant companies dominate each fund equally, which is why they overlap so heavily despite the total market holding seven times as many stocks.

FeatureS&P 500 fundTotal US market fund
Number of stocks~500 large-caps~3,500-4,000 (all sizes)
Share of US market value~80%~100%
Small-cap exposureAlmost noneYes, at market weight (~10-15%)
Typical expense ratio0.02-0.03%0.03%
Historical returnsVery closeVery close
How the two compare (approximate)

Why the difference is so small

Because both funds weight companies by market value, the small companies the total market adds make up only about 10-15% of the fund - and each individual small-cap is a tiny sliver. So even in years when small-caps behave very differently from large-caps, they can only nudge the total market fund a little away from the S&P 500. Over long periods the two funds' returns have tracked within a fraction of a percent of each other.

The theoretical edge goes to the total market
Holding every company means you never have to guess which small companies will grow into large ones - you already own them, and their weight rises automatically as they succeed. Historically small-caps have carried a modest premium, so the total market has a slight theoretical edge, but it's small enough that it can vanish for a decade at a time.

So which should you buy?

  • If your plan is a total-market fund, buy it and never think about this again - it's the most complete single US holding.
  • If your 401(k) only offers an S&P 500 fund (very common), use it happily; you're capturing ~80% of the US market at rock-bottom cost.
  • Don't own both - they overlap so heavily that holding both is just a slightly diluted total market fund with extra clutter.
  • Whichever you pick, pair it with an international fund if you want global diversification; neither of these holds any foreign stocks.
Don't switch back and forth chasing recent results
In years when large-caps lead, the S&P 500 edges ahead; when small-caps lead, the total market does. Swapping between them after each one's hot streak is a subtle form of performance-chasing that reliably buys high and sells low. Pick one and hold it.

The bottom line

The total US stock market fund and the S&P 500 fund are close cousins: same giant companies, same tiny fees, nearly identical returns, with the total market adding a slice of smaller companies for slightly broader coverage. If you're building a portfolio from scratch, the total market fund is the marginally more complete choice; if your only option is an S&P 500 fund, you've lost essentially nothing. This is a decision worth about thirty seconds - spend the saved energy on your savings rate instead.

Check your understanding

1 of 4
Compared with an S&P 500 fund, a total US stock market fund additionally holds:

Not quite — try again.

The Worth letter

Get smarter about money every week

One email, no spam — practical guides and Worth updates. Unsubscribe anytime.

Put this into practice

Worth tracks your accounts, budgets, and goals — so the concepts in this article aren't just theory.

Start free trial