Goal PlanningIntermediate5 min read

The planning number: what return you can actually count on, by horizon

Historical averages are not planning numbers. What return to assume for a 3-year, 7-year, and 15-year goal — and how to glide the risk down as the date approaches.

Every goal plan has a hidden assumption buried in it: the return your money will earn between now and the deadline. Get that number wrong and everything downstream — the monthly contribution, the finish date, the confidence — is wrong with it. The most common error is grabbing the famous long-run stock average (about 10% nominal) and plugging it into a five-year goal, which is a bit like planning a road trip around your car's top speed. Averages describe the long run; goals live in specific, often short, windows. The fix is a planning number: a deliberately conservative return assumption that varies by horizon, plus a schedule for stepping risk down as the goal date approaches.

Why the planning number sits below the average

Three forces push your usable return below the headline average. First, volatility drag: a portfolio that averages 10% arithmetically compounds at more like 8-9% because losses hurt more than equal gains help. Second, sequence risk: over short windows, the order of returns matters enormously — a bad first two years on a five-year goal can be unrecoverable even if the average over the period ends up fine. Third, your goal has a hard date, and hard dates convert volatility from an annoyance into a threat. A retirement account can wait out a bear market; a tuition bill due in August cannot.

HorizonSensible vehicle mixHistorical-ish averagePlanning number
0-2 yearsHigh-yield savings, T-bills, CDs4-5%3-4%
3-5 yearsMostly bonds/cash, 0-30% stocks5-6%4%
5-10 yearsBalanced, 40-60% stocks7-8%5%
10+ yearsStock-heavy, 70-90% stocks9-10%6-7%
Planning returns by horizon — deliberately below historical averages, because a goal cannot wait out a bad sequence.

The gap between the two right-hand columns is not pessimism — it's a margin of safety. If markets deliver the average, you finish early or with a surplus, which is a pleasant problem. If they deliver a bad decade, the conservative assumption means your contribution rate was high enough to survive it. Plans built on optimistic numbers fail quietly for years and then loudly at the deadline.

Same goal, two assumptions, $9,000 apart
Dev needs $60,000 for a down payment in 6 years. At an assumed 9% return, the required contribution is about $645/month. At a 5% planning number, it's about $715/month — $70 more. Now run the bad case: markets actually deliver 3% over those six years. The 9% plan lands at roughly $51,000 — $9,000 short, with the house hunt already underway. The 5% plan lands at about $56,500, close enough to bridge with a few months' delay or a slightly smaller place. And if markets deliver 8%? The conservative plan overshoots to about $66,000 and Dev has a furniture fund. The extra $70/month bought the difference between a plan that bends and one that breaks.

The glide-down: de-risking on a schedule

A 12-year goal is allowed to be aggressive today, but it will be a 3-year goal eventually, and it needs to be invested like one by then. The mechanism is a glide path: a pre-committed schedule for shifting from stocks toward cash as the date approaches. Pre-committed is the operative word — deciding in advance removes the temptation to 'wait for the market to recover' in the exact years when waiting is most dangerous.

  1. 1
    10+ years out: growth mode

    70-90% stocks. Volatility is your friend here — contributions buy more shares in down years, and there's time to recover from anything short of a lost decade.

  2. 2
    5-7 years out: first step down

    Shift to roughly 50-60% stocks. New contributions start going to the bond/cash side. Update the plan using the shorter horizon's planning number — the required contribution usually rises a little.

  3. 3
    3 years out: capital preservation

    Cut stocks to 20-30% or less. A 20% drawdown from here can no longer be earned back by contributions before the deadline. Each strong market month is an opportunity to sell down, not a reason to ride longer.

  4. 4
    12-18 months out: done investing

    Move to cash, T-bills, or CDs maturing before the need date. The goal's return engine is finished; the only job left is showing up in full.

The glide-down feels wrong on purpose
De-risking often means selling stocks during a bull market, which feels like leaving money on the table — and occasionally it is. That's the premium you pay for certainty, and it's worth paying. The households that skip the glide-down are systematically the ones who hit 2008 or 2022 with a college fund or house fund fully in equities, then either sold at the bottom or postponed the goal for years. Missing some upside in the final stretch is a cost measured in hundreds; catching a crash at the deadline is measured in tens of thousands.

Putting the number to work

  1. Write down each goal's dollar target and need date, then read its planning number off the horizon table above.
  2. Solve for the monthly contribution using that number — any goal calculator works; the assumption matters far more than the tool.
  3. Set the starting allocation to match the horizon, and put calendar reminders on the glide-down trigger dates (7 years out, 5, 3, 18 months).
  4. Re-run the math once a year: horizons shrink, so both the planning number and the allocation should drift more conservative even between glide steps.
  5. Treat any surplus from good markets as arriving early, not as license to raise the target mid-flight.
Let the upside be a surprise
A useful mental trick: plan at the conservative number, and mentally book the goal as 'on track' only against that plan. When markets outperform — and over most multi-year stretches they outperform a deliberately low assumption — you experience it as found money and finished-early goals instead of needing it to happen. Optimists make the same contributions feel perpetually behind; conservative planners make them feel perpetually ahead. The dollars are identical.

The bottom line

The return you assume is a decision, not a fact, and it should shrink as the horizon does: roughly 6-7% for 10-plus-year goals, 5% for the middle distance, 4% and falling once the date is inside five years, cash-only returns in the final stretch. Pair the conservative number with a pre-committed glide-down and your goals stop depending on the market cooperating in any particular year. Plan low, glide down early, and let good markets make you early instead of letting bad ones make you late.

Check your understanding

1 of 3
Why does the article's 'planning number' sit below the historical average return?

Not quite — try again.

The Worth letter

Get smarter about money every week

One email, no spam — practical guides and Worth updates. Unsubscribe anytime.

Put this into practice

Worth tracks your accounts, budgets, and goals — so the concepts in this article aren't just theory.

Start free trial